RSSH

3.

Global Fund Board approves 26 catalytic funding priorities for 2020-2022

16 May 2019
A decision on budget awaits outcome of Sixth Replenishment pledging conference

The amount of funding set aside for catalytic investments for 2020-2022, the next allocation period; which catalytic priorities will be funded; and to what extent they will be funded, will all depend on how much money is available for allocation following the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment pledging conference in October 2019.

4.

L’examen stratégique 2017 du Fonds mondial identifie des déficiences dans plusieurs domaines programmatiques, notamment les démarches différenciées, la capacité d’absorption et les transitions

9 Apr 2019
Le rapport final, publié en février 2019, conclut que le Fonds mondial met en œuvre de manière efficace les plans stratégiques

Un rapport préparé fin 2017 – mais publié en février 2019 seulement – est le résultat final d’un examen stratégique réalisé par le Groupe technique de référence en évaluation sur la manière dont le Fonds mondial a mis en œuvre, et continuera de le faire, ses plans stratégiques.

5.

Global Fund’s Strategic Review 2017 identifies gaps in several program areas, including differentiated approaches, absorptive capacity and transitions

1 Apr 2019
Final report, released in February 2019, found that the Fund performed well in operationalizing strategic plans

A report prepared in late 2017 – but not released until February 2019 – is the end product of a strategic review conducted by the Technical Evaluation Reference Group (TERG) on how well the Global Fund has been able, and will be able, to operationalize its strategic plans.

10.

Funding requests to the Global Fund need a stronger focus on integrated service delivery, TRP says

28 Jan 2019
“TB and HIV disease programs still tend to operate through vertically implemented activities”

According to the Technical Review Panel (TRP), integration, both across the three diseases as well as more broadly to other health services such as RMNCAH (reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health) –– a priority articulated in the Global Fund Strategy 2017–2022 –– is lacking in funding requests.

9.

TRP identifies gaps in human resources for health interventions in funding requests to the Global Fund

28 Jan 2019
Often, large requests for HRH initiatives were made at the expense of other essential RSSH investments, TRP says

“Many funding requests do not acknowledge or address the common problem of shortage or maldistribution of human resources for health (HRH),” the Technical Review Panel (TRP) says. “Some funding requests did not mention HRH challenges nor the risks these pose to meeting service delivery targets.”

5.

Funding requests to the Global Fund in next allocation period will need to scale up investments in RSSH, TRP says

14 Jan 2019
TRP releases report on RSSH investments from 2017 to 2019

Despite the progress that has been made, a greater focus on resilient and sustainable systems for health (RSSH) will be required in the 2020–2022 allocation period if the Global Fund is to achieve its RSSH-related strategic objectives, the Technical Review Panel (TRP) says in a report released recently on RSSH investments in the

7.

Global Fund’s technical evaluation group will focus on ‘prospective country evaluations’ and thematic reviews in 2019

10 Dec 2018
Thematic reviews underway on resilient and sustainable systems for health, partnership model, and sustainability, transition and co-financing policy

The Technical Evaluation and Reference Group (TERG) of the Global Fund gave its report to the Board at the pre-Board meeting session held on November 13, 2018, at the new Global Health Campus in Geneva, Switzerland.

1.

Main decisions at Global Fund Board meeting relate to operating expenses budget and private sector engagement

16 Nov 2018
Fund stays within budget ceiling for 2017-2019

On 14-15 November 2018, the Global Fund Board held its 40th meeting in Geneva, Switzerland. GFO was present, with observer status.

4.

Global Fund Board reviews allocation methodology in advance of decision at May 2019 meeting

15 Nov 2018
Some refinements likely but no major changes expected

The Global Fund’s Technical Evaluation Reference Group (TERG), the Technical Review Panel (TRP) and the Secretariat have jointly concluded that the allocation methodology used for 2017–2019 “is effectively delivering on its objectives by increasing funds to countries of higher burden and lower economic capacity while accounting for populations disproportionately affected by the three diseases.”

1.

Political instability, decreasing resources and a resurgent malaria epidemic: A challenging environment for Global Fund grants in Burundi

6 Feb 2018
Malaria incidence doubled between 2014 and 2016

Pages

S'abonner à RSSH